Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Masking of spatial-frequency discrimination.

D Regan

    Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science
    |July 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Visual masking and adaptation affect spatial-frequency discrimination differently. Masking increases noise, while adaptation reduces sensitivity, impacting how the visual system perceives spatial frequencies.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.

    Journal of histotechnology·2021
    Same author

    Immune regulation of canine tumour and macrophage PD-L1 expression.

    Veterinary and comparative oncology·2016
    Same author

    Oral and anal sex are key to sustaining gonorrhoea at endemic levels in MSM populations: a mathematical model.

    Sexually transmitted infections·2015
    Same author

    Head and neck cancer in Australia between 1982 and 2005 show increasing incidence of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers.

    British journal of cancer·2011
    Same author

    Some early uses of evoked brain responses in investigations of human visual function.

    Vision research·2008
    Same author

    Ethnically mismatched cord blood transplants in African Americans: the Saint Louis Cord Blood Bank experience.

    Cytotherapy·2007

    Area of Science:

    • Visual neuroscience
    • Perception psychology

    Background:

    • Spatial-frequency discrimination is crucial for visual perception.
    • Understanding how visual stimuli like maskers and adaptation influence this discrimination is key to understanding visual processing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the distinct effects of masking and adaptation on spatial-frequency discrimination thresholds.
    • To explore the underlying mechanisms of spatial-frequency discrimination, proposing an opponent-size processing model.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a temporal two-alternative forced-choice procedure to measure spatial-frequency discrimination thresholds.
    • Employed superimposed masker gratings with varying frequencies and random presentation to assess masking effects.
    • Investigated postadaptation thresholds after exposure to specific spatial frequencies.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Masker gratings significantly reduced discrimination thresholds, especially when frequencies were similar, due to moiré fringe cues.
    • Randomizing masker frequency revealed elevated thresholds within one octave of the test frequency.
    • Adaptation elevated thresholds at approximately twice the adapting frequency, unlike masking effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Masking and adaptation have differential impacts on spatial-frequency discrimination, despite similar effects on contrast sensitivity.
    • Proposed that opponent-size processing underlies discrimination, with adaptation reducing sensitivity and masking increasing noise in opponent elements.