Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025
Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
Ciprofol versus propofol for long-term sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized
Feng-Zhi Zhao1, Long-Zhu Li1, Pei-Yan Luo2
1Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Background:
Sedatives are often used to facilitate mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis. Ciprofol is a new promising sedated candidate with a higher binding activity to the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A receptor than propofol. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol for long-term sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.
Methods:
In this single-center randomized clinical trial, mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) who anticipated to require long-term sedation ≥ 24 h were randomly assigned to receive intravenous ciprofol or propofol. The target sedation goal was - 3 to 0 according to the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. The primary outcome was weaning time. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of time within the target sedation range, successful sedation (the percentage of time within the target sedation range ≥ 70% without rescue sedation), ICU and in-hospital mortality, length of ICU and hospital stay, hypotension, and bradycardia.
Results:
A total of 60 patients were randomized, 4 were excluded because of withdrawing treatment, 28 were assigned to ciprofol group and 28 to propofol group. Weaning time in ciprofol group was shorter than propofol group (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 104.0 [40.8-147.3] hours vs 132.5 [69.8-207.8] hours), but not reached significant difference between groups (P = 0.123). Ciprofol had significantly higher percentage of time within the target sedation range (median [IQR], 72.2% [14.3-92.7%] vs 22.6% [0.0-45.4%]) and successful sedation (53.6% [15/28] vs 14.3% [4/28]) than propofol. No significant differences were observed in ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, hypotension, and bradycardia between groups.
Conclusions:
Ciprofol is an effective and safe agent among mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis who anticipated to require long-term sedation.
Trial Registration Number:
The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200066835) on December 19, 2022.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:24Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
01:17Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
01:19Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
01:22Stages of General Anesthesia
01:21Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
01:23Sedatives and Hypnotics: Overview
Sedative-hypnotics are categorized into barbiturates, benzodiazepines (BZDs), and non-benzodiazepines or Z-drugs. These drugs work by suppressing central nervous system activity, and this suppression is dose-dependent. Older sedative medications, like barbiturates, follow a linear curve in...