Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Beyond the Block: Development of an Assessment Tool to Evaluate Periprocedural and Communication Skills in Regional
Andres F Rojas1, Fei Chen1, Daniel McMillan1
1The following authors are in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC: Andres F. Rojas, Fei Chen, Daniel McMillan, and Jennifer Allan are Assistant Professors; Xinming An is a Research Assistant Professor; and Robert Isaak, Randall Coombs, Monika Nanda, and Stuart A. Grant are Professors. Maxwell Jolly was an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, and is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.
Background:
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) allows for residency training programs to assess clinical competencies. OSCEs can assess periprocedural skills but are challenging to implement because of their cost and time-intensive nature, especially in subspecialty areas such as regional anesthesia. The objective of this pilot project was to develop and implement an OSCE to assess important competencies in the field of regional anesthesia with focus on periprocedural and communication skills such as the ability to obtain informed consent, select appropriate equipment, and manage complications.
Methods:
Three scenarios were developed after a needs assessment of the institution's regional anesthesia curriculum. No injections were performed, and focus was given to competencies required for effective and safe regional anesthesia practice outside of procedure-specific and technical competencies. We describe the development of the scenarios, exam format, setting and performance, and development of the scoring tool. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the reliability of the project by measuring interrater reliability and internal consistency reliability.
Results:
Three scenarios were developed with a grading tool containing 64 checklist items and 5 global rating scores. Sixty-one percent of checklist items (39 of 64) showed moderate or better interrater reliability and all global rating scores showed moderate or better agreement. All scenarios showed moderate or better internal consistency reliability.
Conclusions:
This pilot project details the development of a regional anesthesia OSCE that offers a valid, reliable, reproducible, cost-effective, and feasible method to assess periprocedural and communication competencies required for successful regional anesthesia practice.
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:

