Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
Effectiveness of Suicide Prevention Programmes Among Adolescents and Sociocultural Adaptation of Programmes: A
Rita Pokharel Poudel1,2, Sheeja Perumbil Pathrose1, Diana Jefferies1
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract:
Suicide is a leading cause of adolescent death and is preventable through school-based programs. This review aimed to identify available suicide prevention programmes for adolescents, their contextualisation, and effects on suicidal behaviours, help-seeking, knowledge, attitude and coping. This review was conducted by searching four databases following PRISMA guidelines. Articles published till September 2023 were searched, and the search was re-run in June 2024. All types of studies conducted among adolescents, outside healthcare facilities and published in English were included. Studies that included adolescents with pre-existing mental health conditions, gender and sexual minority groups were excluded. Quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023469637). A total of 53 of 3663 identified articles were included. There were 41 different suicide prevention programmes used across the 53 studies. Data extraction focused on author, published year, country, study aims, population, interventions, comparison groups, contextualisation and the outcomes of interventions. Most of the studies (64.2%) were conducted in the United States of America. Three studies mentioned the contextualisation of the programme without details. Of the studies measuring suicidal behaviours (82.1%), help-seeking (66.7%), knowledge (93.8%), attitude (81.8%) and coping (50%), all reported on the effectiveness of programmes. Studies from low- and middle-income countries could not be identified, and very few studies mentioned the contextualisation of programmes. The heterogeneity of the studies and diversity of the programmes, tools, standards of delivery and follow-up times across the studies made it difficult to draw conclusions about the overall effectiveness of programmes.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
07:40Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
Published on: May 31, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...