Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative infant and neonatal rotavirus vaccination schedules in Malawi

Catherine Wenger1, Ernest O Asare1,2, Jiye Kwon1,2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

PubMed

Insights

The current rotavirus vaccine strategy in Malawi averts millions of cases. Adding a third dose or switching to a neonatal vaccine offers greater public health and economic benefits for preventing rotavirus disease.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Vaccinology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Rotavirus is a leading cause of severe diarrhea in children under five, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
  • Vaccination is key to preventing rotavirus, but effectiveness is challenged in LMICs.
  • Optimal rotavirus vaccine strategies are needed for Malawi to maximize impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model and compare the impact and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination strategies in Malawi.
  • To evaluate the current two-dose Rotarix schedule against alternative schedules and a new neonatal vaccine (RV3-BB).
  • To inform optimal rotavirus vaccine policy for Malawi from 2025-2034.

Main Methods:

  • A transmission dynamic model of rotavirus was used to estimate cases.
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from government and societal perspectives.
  • Probabilistic sensitivity analysis assessed parameter uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • The current two-dose Rotarix strategy is cost-effective and averts over 1.5 million cases and 90,000 DALYs.
  • Adding a third Rotarix dose could avert 1 million more cases; switching to RV3-BB could avert 1.1 million more cases.
  • The neonatal vaccine is projected to save $3.7 million compared to the current strategy.

Conclusions:

  • Adding a third Rotarix dose is cost-effective at WTP thresholds above $138/DALY averted.
  • The neonatal RV3-BB vaccine presents a more cost-effective alternative to Malawi's current rotavirus vaccination.
  • Both alternative strategies offer substantial benefits over the current approach.