Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Changes in Mammary Gland Morphology and Breast Cancer Risk in Rats
Published on: October 16, 2010
Gendered interpretations of the causes of breast cancer: a structured review of migrant studies
Sasinya N Scott1,2,3, Michelle L Lui4, Lauren C Houghton4
1Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168 Street, Room 706, New York, NY, 10032, USA. sasinya.scott@downstate.edu.
Background:
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women worldwide. Despite it having an etiology that has fixed, genetic as well as modifiable, environmental risk factors, the narrative around breast cancer prevention emphasizes gendered interpretations of the etiology, such as "reproductive factors cause breast cancer" and women should change their behaviors to reduce their risk. Since migrant studies can distinguish environmental from genetic risk factors, we conducted a structured review of migrant studies and assessed prominent cancer website resources to determine evidence of gender bias between breast and prostate cancer.
Methods:
We searched ten online databases for articles with migration as the exposure and breast cancer mortality and/or incidence as the outcome. We also searched using prostate cancer as the outcome to generate a comparison group. We developed rubrics to categorize the studies by study design (single, double, and time dimensional), convergence (a change in incidence or mortality for the migrant population), and concordance (consistency between results and author-attributed etiology). We used chi-square tests to test for differences by cancer type. We web-scraped four notable cancer websites to extract website layouts, risk factor information, and language describing breast cancer etiology and compared it to the content used for prostate cancer.
Findings:
Of all 140 studies and 220 comparisons, breast (n = 131) outnumbered prostate cancer studies (n = 89; p-value = 0·005). For both cancers, studies that compared all three populations (the non-migrant, origin, and destination population outcomes) or measured length of stay demonstrated that cancer rates converged with migration. Most authors attributed breast cancer etiology to genetic and environmental factors. Yet, the migrant study results were inconsistent with public health messaging; all four websites framed breast cancer as more modifiable than prostate cancer.
Conclusion:
Research efforts and public health messaging for breast cancer should consider gendered barriers to changing individual-level risk factors and develop more prevention strategies at the health systems level.
More Related Videos
09:44Generation of Organ-conditioned Media and Applications for Studying Organ-specific Influences on Breast Cancer Metastatic Behavior
Published on: June 13, 2016
11:41Methods for Culturing Human Femur Tissue Explants to Study Breast Cancer Cell Colonization of the Metastatic Niche
Published on: March 15, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Cancer Prevention
Some...