Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
A Prospective Study on the Detection of Gastric Neoplasms Using Pepsinogen and Gastrin-17 Levels
Sun-Young Lee1, Hee-Won Moon2, Yeon-Sun Ahn2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Background/Aims:
GastroPanel tests include gastrin-17 (G-17) levels in addition to pepsinogen (PG) and Helicobacter pylori serology tests. The aim of this study was to identify significant test findings in patients with gastric neoplasms by comparing the findings of GastroPanel tests and conventional serum PG assays.
Methods:
Consecutive individuals who underwent serological testing were included from May 2023 to August 2024. Foreigners and those with gastrectomy, renal insufficiency, previous H. pylori eradication, and recent acid suppressant use were excluded.
Results:
Among the 1,101 participants, 122 were diagnosed with gastric neoplasms. High G-17 levels (odds ratio [OR], 1.030; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.008 to 1.052), low I/II ratios determined by GastroPanel tests (OR, 0.834; 95% CI, 0.779 to 0.894), and low I/II ratios determined by HBI PG assays (OR, 0.584; 95% CI, 0.511 to 0.668) were significant variables for detecting gastric neoplasms. The cutoff values for low I/II ratios were <6.15 (GastroPanel test) and <3.005 (HBI assay), with no differences in diagnostic performance between the two tests (p=0.085). Although the I/II ratio alone was a significant independent variable for detecting early gastric cancers, advanced gastric cancers, adenomas, and neuroendocrine tumors, the G-17 level alone was significant only for adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. The findings of the patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors did not differ from those of the controls.
Conclusions:
Blood test findings are useful for detecting gastric neoplasms, except for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The addition of G-17 levels to PG tests is only beneficial for diagnosing gastric neoplasms associated with corpus atrophy, such as adenoma and neuroendocrine tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05883345).
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors

