Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

07:44
In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
2.8K
Enhanced Phenotype Identification of Common Ocular Diseases in Real-World Datasets
Joshua D Stein1,2, Hong Su An1, Chris A Andrews1
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ophthalmology Science
|April 11, 2025
Summary
Enhanced phenotype identification (EPI) models accurately detect diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, and glaucoma in real-world data, outperforming traditional billing codes for improved patient cohort identification.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Health Informatics
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Accurately identifying patient phenotypes in real-world data is crucial but challenging.
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) billing codes are often used but have limitations for precise patient cohort identification.
- Electronic Health Records (EHR) contain rich data for phenotype identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate enhanced phenotype identification (EPI) algorithms for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and glaucoma.
- To compare the performance of EPI models against ICD-only models in EHR data.
- To assess the accuracy of EPI models in identifying patients with these common ocular diseases.
Main Methods:
- Developed EPI algorithms to analyze various EHR fields (e.g., examination findings, orders, medications, surgeries).
- Trained and validated EPI models using gold-standard ophthalmologist assessments of EHR data.
- Compared EPI model performance against ICD-only models and validated on a separate data repository site.
Main Results:
- EPI models demonstrated superior performance over ICD-only models for glaucoma, DR, and AMD, evidenced by higher Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC).
- For glaucoma, EPI AUC was 0.97 vs. 0.90 (ICD-only); for DR, 0.997 vs. 0.98; for AMD, 0.99 vs. 0.95.
- Validation on a second site showed high performance, though model calibration was slightly reduced.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning-driven EPI models accurately identify patients with glaucoma, DR, and AMD in real-world datasets.
- EPI models significantly outperform ICD-only approaches, highlighting the value of comprehensive EHR data analysis.
- These findings support improved patient management and clinical outcomes through enhanced phenotype identification.

