Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Instinctive Drift01:05

Instinctive Drift

161
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
161
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

27.4K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
27.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.4K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does the attentional window shed light on the attentional capture debate?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

What distinguishes optimal visual searchers? Evidence from a probe procedure.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Assessing individual differences in grouping strategy in visual working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Don't look there: Assessing the suppression of cued-to-be-ignored locations.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Individual variation in encoding strategy optimization in visual working memory: Evidence from a change detection task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

Proactive suppression is an implicit process that cannot be summoned on demand.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2024
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K

Learned distractor rejection: Robust but surprisingly rapid.

Isaac Savelson1, Christopher Hauck2, Mei-Ching Lien2

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. savelson.1@osu.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|April 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated learned distractor rejection, the ability to ignore irrelevant visual stimuli. Replications failed to confirm previous findings using standard analysis, but revealed rapid learning of distractor ignoring with finer-grained methods.

Keywords:
Attentional captureInhibitionVisual search

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

37.7K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2025

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

9.7K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

37.7K
Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Goal-directed navigation in complex visual environments requires suppressing distractions.
  • Learned distractor rejection, the ability to ignore repetitive irrelevant stimuli, has been previously proposed.
  • Few studies have directly tested learned distractor rejection since its initial conception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly replicate previous findings on learned distractor rejection.
  • To investigate the timescale and conditions under which distractor ignoring is learned.

Main Methods:

  • Three independent direct replications of Vatterott and Vecera's (2012) methodology were conducted.
  • Data were analyzed using both conventional split-block analysis and finer-grained timescale analyses.
  • Participants performed tasks requiring navigation and ignoring of salient, repetitive distractors.

Main Results:

  • Conventional split-block analyses failed to replicate the original study's findings.
  • Finer-grained timescale analyses revealed compelling evidence for learned ignoring of salient distractors.
  • Efficient distractor rejection emerged rapidly, within two to three encounters with the distracting item.

Conclusions:

  • The ability to learn to ignore salient distractors is acquired much faster than previously assumed.
  • Replication failures highlight the importance of analytical methods in uncovering subtle cognitive processes.
  • This rapid learning mechanism is crucial for efficient visual search and goal-directed behavior.