Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
Privacy for free in the overparameterized regime
Simone Bombari1, Marco Mondelli1
1Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg 3400, Austria.
Abstract:
Differentially private gradient descent (DP-GD) is a popular algorithm to train deep learning models with provable guarantees on the privacy of the training data. In the last decade, the problem of understanding its performance cost with respect to standard GD has received remarkable attention from the research community, which has led to upper bounds on the excess population risk [Formula: see text] in different learning settings. However, such bounds typically degrade with overparameterization, i.e., as the number of parameters [Formula: see text] gets larger than the number of training samples [Formula: see text]-a regime which is ubiquitous in current deep-learning practice. As a result, the lack of theoretical insights leaves practitioners without clear guidance, leading some to reduce the effective number of trainable parameters to improve performance, while others use larger models to achieve better results through scale. In this work, we show that in the popular random features model with quadratic loss, for any sufficiently large [Formula: see text], privacy can be obtained for free, i.e., [Formula: see text], not only when the privacy parameter [Formula: see text] has constant order but also in the strongly private setting [Formula: see text]. This challenges the common wisdom that overparameterization inherently hinders performance in private learning.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Censoring Survival Data
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...

