Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Navigating Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Assessment by Organ Systems: A Guidebook to HER2 Testing in Solid Tumors.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

HER2 In Situ Hybridization: Validation and Implementation of Brightfield Assay in a US Academic Pathology Laboratory.

Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM·2026
Same author

Longitudinal multi-platform profiling reveals temporal dynamics of HER2, TROP2, PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Phase 1 trial of pre-operative image guided intensity modulated photon radiotherapy with simultaneously integrated boost to the high-risk margin for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026
Same author

Breast Cancer Reirradiation Practice Patterns: An International Survey From the Reirradiation Collaborative Group (ReCOG).

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Sensitivity to endocrine therapy index predicts benefit from weekly adjuvant paclitaxel for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the GEICAM/9906 trial.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same journal

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2026.3.2.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Metabolic Modulation in Cancer Care: The Potential Role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Long-Term Follow-Up of JCOG1008, a Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Chemoradiotherapy Comparing 3-Weekly Cisplatin With Weekly Cisplatin in Postoperative Head and Neck Cancer.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

First-Line Disitamab Vedotin, Tislelizumab, and S-1 in HER2-Overexpressing Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Retraction: Neoadjuvant Adebrelimab Plus Chemotherapy in Untreated Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Efficacy and Biomarker Insights From a Single-Arm Phase II Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same journal

Donor Selection and Human Leukocyte Antigen Loss Leukemia Relapse After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

181

Novel Postneoadjuvant Prognostic Breast Cancer Staging System.

David J Winchester1, Lavisha Singh2, Stephen B Edge3

  • 1City of Hope Chicago, Zion, IL.

Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
|April 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new prognostic staging system accurately predicts survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) by incorporating treatment response. This validated system provides crucial American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage assignments for NACT-treated patients.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.0K
Surgical Procedures and Methodology for a Preclinical Murine Model of De Novo Mammary Cancer Metastasis
08:41

Surgical Procedures and Methodology for a Preclinical Murine Model of De Novo Mammary Cancer Metastasis

Published on: July 29, 2017

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

181
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.0K
Surgical Procedures and Methodology for a Preclinical Murine Model of De Novo Mammary Cancer Metastasis
08:41

Surgical Procedures and Methodology for a Preclinical Murine Model of De Novo Mammary Cancer Metastasis

Published on: July 29, 2017

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used for cancer treatment.
  • Current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging lacks prognostic assessment post-NACT.
  • Accurate staging is crucial for patient management and outcome prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a prognostic staging system that incorporates response to NACT.
  • To address the deficiency in AJCC staging for patients receiving NACT.
  • To improve prognostic accuracy by including standardized staging variables and response categories.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the National Cancer Database (2010-2018) for 140,605 NACT-treated patients.
  • Categorized response to NACT into no response, partial response, and complete response (pCR).
  • Performed univariate and multivariate analyses, validating predictive models using bootstrap techniques and calibration plots.

Main Results:

  • Validated models showed significant survival differences based on postneoadjuvant prognostic stage.
  • Patients achieving pCR were predominantly assigned ypStage I (94.2%) versus those with no response (35.5%).
  • Clinical stage impacted OS differently based on response: small impact with pCR, profound decrease with no response in TNBC/HER2+ disease.

Conclusions:

  • A novel, validated prognostic staging system predicting overall survival (OS) based on NACT response has been developed.
  • This system provides essential AJCC stage assignments for the growing population of patients treated with NACT.
  • The findings enhance prognostic accuracy and clinical decision-making for NACT-treated individuals.