Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

10:07
Immunostaining-Based Detection of Dynamic Alterations in Red Blood Cell Proteins
Published on: March 17, 2023
1.0K
Machine learning-based detection and quantification of red blood cells in Cholistani cattle: A pilot study
Sami Ul Rehman1, Sania Fayyaz1, Muhammad Usman2
1Department of Zoology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Research in Veterinary Science
|April 11, 2025
Summary
Machine learning accurately detects and counts normal and abnormal red blood cells (RBCs) in Cholistani cattle, showing no significant difference from manual methods. This artificial intelligence approach offers potential for veterinary hematology.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Hematology
- Machine Learning
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Accurate red blood cell (RBC) counting is crucial for animal health diagnostics.
- Manual methods are labor-intensive and prone to human error.
- Exploring automated, AI-driven solutions for veterinary hematology is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a machine learning model for detecting and counting normal and abnormal RBCs in Cholistani cattle.
- To compare the performance of a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model against manual counting techniques.
- To assess the classification accuracy and precision for normal RBCs, tear-drop cells, and schistocytes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized pre-annotated blood smear images from Cholistani cattle.
- Applied contrast stretching, segmentation, and resizing for image preprocessing.
- Employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature reduction and an SVM model for classification, with data augmentation and an 80/20 train-test split.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) was found between machine learning-based and manual RBC counts.
- The SVM model achieved high classification probabilities for normal RBCs (87%), tear-drop cells (84%), and schistocytes (73%).
- Accuracy was highest for tear-drop cells (0.991), followed by normal RBCs (0.965), and precision was also high for normal RBCs (0.932) and tear-drop cells (0.921).
Conclusions:
- Machine learning, specifically SVM models, can accurately and precisely detect and count normal RBCs and tear-drop cells in Cholistani cattle.
- The AI approach demonstrates comparable results to manual counting, offering a viable alternative for veterinary hematological assessments.
- Further research using deep learning methods like convolution neural networks is recommended to enhance RBC detection capabilities.

