Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Patient-Specific Preoperative Plans Can Optimize Femoral Head Coverage and Range of Motion After Periacetabular
Shuyang Han1, Carey A Clark1, Nicholas J Dunbar1
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.
Background:
The goal of a periacetabular osteotomy is to increase the coverage of the femoral head, primarily in the antero-lateral region, through rotation of the acetabulum in three anatomical planes. The present study was undertaken to determine whether specific combinations of lateral rotation, anterior rotation, and anteversion of the acetabular fragment can be targeted to provide the best balance between femoral head coverage and joint motion.
Methods:
Three-dimensional patient-specific hip models were reconstructed from preoperative computerized tomography scans of 15 patients diagnosed with hip dysplasia. Each model was placed in a standard coordinate system with neutral pelvic tilt and femoral rotation. Osteotomies of a standard Bernese periacetabular osteotomy were performed, and 12 surgical plans (lateral center-edge angle: 25, 30, and 35°; acetabular anteversion: 0 and 10°; and anterior rotation: 0 and 10°) were simulated for each patient to analyze the changes in femoral head coverage and maximum hip internal rotation at 90° flexion. The percentage of patients achieving acceptable coverage and hip motion was compared between the surgical plans.
Results:
No single plan led to acceptable values of coverage and internal rotation in all patients. The "30° lateral center-edge angle-10° anterior rotation-10° anteversion" plan achieved the highest percentage (86.7%) of patients who have acceptable outcomes, while the "35-10-0°" plan resulted in the worst outcome (13.3%). Additionally, the standard "30-0-0°" plan was able to achieve acceptable outcomes in 73.3% of patients.
Conclusions:
Different combinations of acetabular rotations can result in large variations in femoral head coverage and hip motion, and no single combination is applicable to all cases. Therefore, preoperative planning based on patient-specific morphological characteristics is recommended to determine the best procedure for each case.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
08:15Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management