Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
Published on: June 9, 2023
Optimization of nano-finned enclosure-shaped latent heat thermal energy storage units using CFD, RSM, and enhanced
Tao Hai1,2, Ihab Omar3, As'ad Alizadeh4,5
1Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, P.O.Box: 346, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract:
Thermal energy storage plays a critical role in improving energy efficiency and sustainability, particularly in solar energy systems, industrial waste heat recovery, and building temperature regulation. However, traditional latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems face significant challenges due to the low thermal conductivity of phase change materials (PCMs), leading to prolonged charging/discharging times and reduced efficiency. To address these limitations, this study presents a framework for optimizing nano-finned enclosure-shaped LHTES units that incorporate nano-enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) and fins. The research employs a novel hybrid approach that integrates computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, response surface methodology (RSM), and an enhanced hill climbing (EHC) optimization technique to explore the complex interplay between fin geometry and nanomaterial characteristics. The influence of key design variables-including three fin geometry parameters (number, length, volume), nanomaterial concentration, and eight nanomaterials (metal, oxide, and carbon-based)-is analyzed to optimize phase change time and total stored energy. Results demonstrate that reduced sixth-degree and reduced quartic polynomial models, developed through RSM, provide high accuracy in predicting total stored energy and melting time, respectively. While the incorporation of nanomaterials generally reduces total stored energy due to their lower latent heat, carbon-based nanomaterials (GNPs, MWCNTs) offer an optimal trade-off, achieving faster melting times with minimal energy storage loss. Among the studied parameters, fin volume fraction plays a more dominant role in determining energy storage capacity compared to nanomaterial volume fraction. The optimal design configuration varies based on the priority assigned to melting time or stored energy. In a melting-time-focused scenario, the optimized unit achieves 63.03 kJ of stored energy with a melting time of 91.76 s. When prioritizing energy storage, the stored energy increases to 66.15 kJ, but the melting time extends to 222.3 s. A balanced optimization scenario yields 64.67 kJ of stored energy and a melting time of 137.4 s. These findings provide valuable insights into the design and optimization of advanced LHTES units for enhanced thermal energy management.
More Related Videos
10:36Author Spotlight: Optimization of Airflow Velocities in Battery Cooling Systems for Enhanced Thermal Performance and Reduced Energy Consumption
Published on: November 3, 2023
04:35Author Spotlight: Simulation and Analysis of the Temperature Rise of Ring Main Unit Equipment
Published on: July 5, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer I
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer II
Thermal expansion and Thermal stress: Problem Solving
To solve the problem, first, identify the known and unknown quantities. The initial length (L) of the bridge is 1275 m, the coefficient of linear expansion (α) for steel is 12 x 10-6/°C, and the change in temperature (ΔT) is 55 °C.
Energy Conservation and Bernoulli's Equation
All the terms in the equation have the dimension of energy per unit volume. The kinetic energy per unit volume is called the kinetic energy density, and the potential energy per unit volume is...
Mechanisms of Heat Transfer
Conduction, accounting for approximately 3% of body heat loss at rest, is the process of exchanging heat between molecules of two materials in direct contact. This can result in both heat loss and gain. For instance, when the body is submerged in water, which conducts heat 20 times more effectively than air, it can either lose or gain significant heat.
Lagrange Multipliers: Problem Solving