Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

A High-Throughput Comet Assay Approach for Assessing Cellular DNA Damage
Published on: May 10, 2022
AMH decline during chemotherapy reflects breast cancer cell DNA damage response (DDR) proficiency: the ONCO AMH1
Christine Decanter1,2, Audrey Dassonneville3, Emmanuelle D'Orazio1
1Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation et de Préservation de Fertilité, CHU Lille, 59037, Lille, France.
Purpose:
The impact of a germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (gBRCApv) on baseline or late post-treatment AMH concentrations in breast cancer patients has been extensively studied, yielding mixed conclusions. However, whether the AMH decline during neo-adjuvant chemotherapy reflects differences in chemotherapy susceptibility between gBRCApv carriers and non-carriers remains unexplored.
Methods:
A monocentric, retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted on breast cancer patients carrying a gBRCApv (n = 12) or wild-type (WT) (n = 35) who received a neo-adjuvant sequential chemotherapy (CT) with anthracyclines followed by taxanes. Serum AMH levels were measured at baseline (AMH0) and at three time points during CT by a hypersensitive assay. Tumor size change was assessed via imaging. The impact of genetic status on AMH decline was evaluated using a linear mixed model with post hoc analysis.
Results:
The change of AMH concentrations from baseline to the end of CT tended to be influenced by the genetic status (BRCA * time interaction, p = 0.058). The slope between AMH0 and the end of anthracyclines (after log transformation) was steeper in gBRCApv than in WT patients (mean (SE): - 5.54 (0.63) vs - 3.97 (0.62); p = 0.023). Tumor size change was positively and significantly correlated with the change in AMH levels (AMH MidCT-AMH0) in gBRCApv patients (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) but not in WT patients (r = - 0.05; p = 0.84).
Conclusion:
Germline BRCA1/2 status influences AMH decline during neo-adjuvant CT with drugs inducing DNA lesions. AMH decay is positively related to tumor size change assessed by imaging in gBRCApv patients. However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the relationship with treatment response assessed by histological criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

