Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Research Method, Conduct, and Reporting Considerations for Improving the Quality of Non-Hypothesis-Evaluating
Eric Barrette1, William H Crown2, Melinda Hanisch3
1Medtronic Inc, Washington DC, USA.
Objectives:
Numerous real-world evidence guidance documents have been published by many regulatory agencies, health technology assessment agencies, and academic groups. These guidances are largely focused on generating unbiased treatment effect estimates from real-world data (RWD) for use in approval and coverage decisions. One of the most prominently cited documents, is a joint ISPOR/ISPE Task Force guidance on the use of RWD for Hypothesis-Evaluating Treatment Effectiveness (HETE) Studies. However, there are a variety of uses of RWD that existing guidance does not explicitly address. Our goal was to assess existing guidance for its relevance to a range of non-HETE analyses.
Methods:
In this article, we delineate categories of non-HETE applications of RWD. This range of applications includes various types of non-HETE RWD analyses, as well as the use of RWD as inputs into other types of analyses, such as health economic modeling or simulation studies that are not typically considered RWD studies. We then map existing guidance documents to the categories of non-HETE studies to help identify existing resources for analysts interested in conducting these types of analyses.
Results:
We identified 13 published guidance documents for detailed review, including documents that outline best practices, provide checklists, or are structured templates. They were selected for their prominence, recency, specific reference to fit-for-purpose real-world evidence generation, or their relevance to specific analysis categories.
Conclusions:
We conclude that existing guidance documents, although they were largely developed for HETE studies, are highly useful for the broad range of non-HETE RWD analyses as well.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Blind Procedures
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Nursing Evaluation
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...