Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report01:21

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

754
An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
754
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

633
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
633
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records01:18

Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records

709
Maintaining nurses' educational and administrative records in healthcare settings, including hospitals and nursing schools, is paramount. Here's a breakdown of the types of academic records mentioned:
709
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.8K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.3K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.3K
Legal Guidelines for Documentation01:06

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

1.2K
The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Punishing Misconduct: Sanctions for Fraudulent Research in Anesthesia and Beyond.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026
Same author

Correction: LKB1 promotes cell survival by modulating TIF-IA-mediated pre-ribosomal RNA synthesis under uridine downregulated conditions.

Oncotarget·2026
Same author

Quantifying Innovation in Stroke: Large Language Model Bibliometric Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

MGAT1-Guided complex N-Glycans on CD73 regulate immune evasion in triple-negative breast cancer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Please don't cite this editorial.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2025
Same author

Deep learning biomarker of chronometric and biological ischemic stroke lesion age from unenhanced CT.

NPJ digital medicine·2024
Same journal

Prohibited AI Practices in Healthcare under the European Artificial Intelligence Act.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Probing the Prevalence of Pharmaceutical Corruption.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Regulatory Guidance for the Return of Raw Genomic Data to Research Participants: A Qualitative Interview Study.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Supported Decision-Making and the Inclusion of People who Lack Decisional Capacity in Greater than Minimal Risk Research.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Using Supported Decision-Making to Promote Value-Aligned Research Participation.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
Same journal

Intellectual Disability and Supported Decision-Making in Clinical Research: Anticipating Ethical Challenges.

The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.4K

Why Universities Should Make Misconduct Reports Public.

Ivan Oransky1,2,3, Adam Marcus1,4

  • 1Retraction Watch, United States.

The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
|April 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Universities often withhold misconduct investigation reports, creating an evidence gap in research integrity. This paper advocates for the default disclosure of these crucial institutional misconduct documents.

Keywords:
fraudinvestigationsresearch misconductuniversities

More Related Videos

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.3K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

8.4K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.3K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Research Integrity
  • Academic Misconduct
  • Scientific Governance

Background:

  • Availability of institutional and university misconduct investigation reports is limited.
  • Calls for greater transparency in academic misconduct proceedings are increasing.
  • Current practices often result in restricted access to critical research integrity documentation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the availability of research misconduct investigation reports.
  • To review university responses to requests for disclosure of misconduct findings.
  • To argue for the default release of institutional misconduct investigation reports.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of university policies on misconduct disclosure.
  • Analysis of responses to public and academic requests for investigation reports.
  • Argumentative synthesis of evidence gap created by non-disclosure.

Main Results:

  • Universities frequently resist disclosing misconduct investigation reports.
  • Failure to release reports hinders the assessment of research integrity.
  • A significant evidence gap exists due to lack of transparency.

Conclusions:

  • The non-disclosure of misconduct reports creates a critical evidence gap in research integrity.
  • Universities should adopt a default policy of disclosing misconduct investigation reports.
  • Increased transparency is essential for maintaining public trust in science.