Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
The Impact of Individual Mandate and Income on Private Health Insurance Enrollment: A State-Level Analysis on
Hyunji Kim1, Jinyoung Cha1, Jaeyoung Jang2
1The Askew School of Public Administration and Policy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Introduction:
Health insurance, vital for improved health outcomes and reduced financial burdens, faced challenges within the market system due to adverse selection and the risk of a death spiral. This led to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) introducing the Individual Mandate in 2014. After the penalty under the Individual Mandate had been repealed, several states have kept regulative measures to encourage individuals to keep health insurance.
Methods:
This study analyzed the impact of individual mandates in four states and D.C. on private health insurance enrollment using pooled cross-sectional data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) USA. The dataset included 4,524,753 non-elderly individuals (ages 19 to 64) from 2019 to 2021. A logistic regression model was employed to estimate the likelihood of having private health insurance, with the individual mandate as a state-level binary variable and income as a continuous predictor. Interaction effects between income and the mandate were examined. To further interpret the results, marginal effects were calculated to quantify the impact of the individual mandate and income on the probability of private health insurance enrollment.
Results:
The study revealed a positive association between the individual mandate regulation and increased private health insurance enrollment. Additionally, income exhibited a positive influence on enrollment in private health insurance coverage. Notably, when considering the moderating effect of income, the mandate had a more pronounced impact on lower-income individuals, resulting in a 0.885% decrease in the probability of having private health insurance for every 10k increase in individual income.
Conclusion:
The findings highlight that individuals in the mandated states are more likely to have private health insurance, addressing adverse selection issues and stabilizing the health insurance market. However, the mandate disproportionately affects lower-income individuals, suggesting the need for additional financial assistance to sustain enrollment. Policymakers should consider complementary support programs, such as subsidies and cost-sharing reductions, to mitigate financial burdens and ensure broader coverage. Maintaining an individual mandate alongside targeted financial policies can contribute to a more equitable and sustainable healthcare system.
More Related Videos
07:44Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...