Clinical Outcomes and Microbiological Profiles of Patients with Culture-Confirmed Peritonitis

Yusuf Emre Özdemir1, Esra Ensaroğlu1, Samiha Akkaya1

  • 1Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.

Abstract

Insights

This study identified key risk factors for peritonitis mortality, including male gender, advanced age, and secondary perforation. Empirical treatment should target common pathogens like E. coli and consider resistance profiles for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology
  • Clinical Medicine

Background:

  • Peritonitis, an inflammation of the peritoneum, presents significant clinical challenges with varying outcomes.
  • Understanding the spectrum of causative microorganisms, their resistance patterns, and associated risk factors is crucial for effective management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify pathogenic microorganisms and their antibiotic resistance profiles in patients with culture-confirmed peritonitis.
  • To analyze clinical outcomes and determine mortality-related risk factors in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A single-center, retrospective study involving adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with culture-confirmed peritonitis.
  • Data collected included patient demographics, peritonitis type (primary vs. secondary), isolated pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, clinical course, and mortality.

Main Results:

  • The study analyzed 134 patients, with 36.5% 30-day mortality. Common pathogens included Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp., and Staphylococcus aureus.
  • Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) rates were notably high in E. coli isolates (33% in primary, 63% in secondary peritonitis).
  • Mortality was associated with male gender, advanced age, high AST levels, and secondary perforation, while peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis and CoNS infections were less common in deceased patients.

Conclusions:

  • Demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors significantly influence peritonitis outcomes.
  • Empirical treatment strategies should be tailored based on peritonitis type and local resistance patterns, considering Gram-positive bacteria and sensitive enteric bacilli for primary peritonitis, and ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria for secondary peritonitis.
  • Close monitoring and consideration of antifungal agents for severely ill patients with secondary peritonitis are recommended.