Comparing the long-term prognosis and renal function changes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN)
Yudong Cao1, Yushuang Cui1, Ruojing Li1
1Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Urology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Background:
Radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) are common surgical treatments for T1 stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the long-term impact of these surgical approaches on prognosis and renal function remains an area of ongoing investigation. This study compared the effects of these procedures on prognosis and renal function.
Methods:
The data of 1,030 T1 stage RCC patients treated at Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute between January 2014 and August 2022 were analyzed. The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The secondary endpoints included the annual mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the average annual eGFR change rates.
Results:
Based on a median follow-up time of 57 months, the OS and CSS rates were 96.6% and 98.5% in the overall cohort, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified age [hazard ratio (HR), 2.664; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.147-6.192; P=0.02], tumor grade (HR, 2.247; 95% CI: 1.050-4.810; P=0.04), and surgical approach (HR, 2.585; 95% CI: 1.056-6.325; P=0.04) as adverse prognostic factors for OS, and age (HR, 4.603; 95% CI: 1.035-20.471; P=0.045) and tumor grade (HR, 4.972; 95% CI: 1.752-14.111; P=0.003) as adverse prognostic factors for CSS. Throughout the follow-up period, the eGFR of the RN patients showed a gradual increase, while that of the PN patients remained stable (P<0.001). Among the patients with preoperative diabetes, the eGFR of the RN patients decreased significantly compared to that of the PN patients (P=0.03).
Conclusions:
T1 stage RCC has a favorable prognosis with surgery, and PN is an oncologically safe option. A persistent eGFR difference was observed between the PN and RN groups, with RN showing a gradual upward trend. However, patients with pre-existing diabetes experienced a greater decline in renal function after RN, which highlights the advantages of PN for such patients.
