Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Resource Recycling of Red Soil to Synthesize Fe2O3/FAU-type Zeolite Composite Material for Heavy Metal Removal
Published on: June 2, 2022
[Spatial Distribution, Influencing Factors, Risk Assessment, and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soil Profile of
Shu Zhu1, Shu-Yi Li2, Yang Yu2
1College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Abstract:
In order to understand the spatial distribution, influencing factors, ecological risk characteristics, and sources of heavy metals in the soil profile (0-1 m) of farmland in the Guanzhong Plain, soil samples of 0-1 m were collected from 124 sites in the Guanzhong Plain. The contents of heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in soil were analyzed at different depths (0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-40 cm, 40-60 cm, and 60-100 cm). The study generated the spatial distribution characteristics of soil heavy metals based on geostatistics and investigated the influencing factors of heavy metals based on structural equation modeling (SEM). In addition, the ecological environmental risks of soil heavy metals were evaluated using the methods of index of geo-accumulation (Igeo), single factor contaminant index (P), and potential ecological risk index (E). Finally, the sources of soil heavy metals were analyzed using the PMF model. The results showed that the average heavy metal content of ω(As), ω(Cd), ω(Cr), ω(Cu), ω(Ni), ω(Pb), and ω(Zn) in the 0-10 cm were 19.57, 0.71, 69.65, 21.91, 28.67, 17.54, and 73.77 mg·kg-1, respectively. The average values of As, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn exceeded the background values. With the increasing soil depth, all heavy metals showed a decreasing trend except for Cd and Ni. The spatial distribution indicated that different heavy metals in the same soil layer had different spatial distributions, and the spatial distribution of heavy metals also varied at different depths. The structural equation model showed that the factors affecting the distribution of heavy metals at different depths were deeply dependent. The ecological risk assessment showed that Cd at different depths had higher ecological risks, while the rest were considered minor risks. The sources of 0-40 cm soil layer were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence and industrial sources; the sources of 40-100 cm were consistent, and the main sources were pesticides and herbicides, organic fertilizers and fertilizers, natural sources, and traffic-induced atmospheric subsidence.
More Related Videos
14:10Separation and Identification of Conventional Microplastics from Farmland Soils
Published on: March 21, 2025
09:51TD-DFT Guided Advanced E-Eye Sensing Technique for On-site Quantification of Fe, Cr, F, and As in the Environmental, Biological, and Food Samples
Published on: September 19, 2025
Related Concept Videos
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Periodic Table Provides Information...
Voltammetry: Stripping Methods
Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV)
ASV is used to determine metals and metalloids at trace levels. It involves two steps: deposition and stripping. First, a negative potential is applied to the...
Gravimetry: Overview
In precipitation gravimetry, the analyte is converted into a precipitate and weighed. For example, the silver content in a sample can be estimated by precipitating and...
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Microbial Leaching
Acid Mine Drainage