Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

11:35
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
57.7K
Functional Rating Scale 2.0 (FuRST 2.0): A patient-reported outcome measure of function for Huntington's disease
Rebecca Lm Fuller1, Pua Feigenbaum1, Nancy LaPelle2
1CHDI Management, Inc., the company that manages the scientific activities of CHDI Foundation, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Journal of Huntington'S Disease
|April 15, 2025
Summary
A new patient-reported outcome measure, the Functional Rating Scale 2.0 (FuRST 2.0), was developed to detect early functional changes in Huntington's disease (HD). This scale aims to improve sensitivity in stages 2 and mild stage 3 of HD.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Existing functional rating scales lack sensitivity to early functional decline in Huntington's disease (HD).
- Early detection of functional changes is crucial for timely intervention in HD progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure, the Functional Rating Scale 2.0 (FuRST 2.0).
- To ensure FuRST 2.0 is sensitive to initial functional changes in Huntington's disease (HD), particularly stages 2 and mild stage 3.
Main Methods:
- Utilized standard assessment development methodology, including focus groups with HD patients and companions across six countries.
- Employed a Delphi panel and four rounds of cognitive interviews to refine scale comprehension and usability.
- Incorporated informal regulatory agency advice throughout the development process.
Main Results:
- Addressed concerns from patients and regulators regarding scale instructions, questions, response options, and overall comfort.
- Modified the scale's wording and format based on feedback to enhance clarity and user experience.
Conclusions:
- Developed the FuRST 2.0 official working document (OWD), a penultimate version of the scale.
- The OWD was created using a rigorous methodology involving patient input, expert consensus, and cognitive testing.
- Psychometric properties are currently under evaluation; the FuRST 2.0 OWD is available for use.
Keywords:
Delphi panelHuntington's diseasecognitive interviewfocus groupfunctionpatient-reported outcomequalitative researchMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
243
A thorough health history and physical assessment are essential for identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) symptoms and distinguishing them from other health issues.
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
243
Self-Report Tests of Personality
272
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
272

