Impact of Universal PCV10 Vaccination on Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Croatian Children

Iva Butić1,2, Goran Tešović1,3, Kristian Bodulić1

  • 1From the University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb, Croatia.

Insights

The introduction of pneumococcal conjugated vaccine 10 (PCV10) significantly reduced invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Croatian children, especially those under five. Current serotypes suggest a need for updated vaccines like PCV15 or PCV20.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Infectious Diseases
  • Vaccinology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Streptococcus pneumoniae remains a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality globally.
  • Pneumococcal conjugated vaccines (PCVs) are widely used but their impact on disease epidemiology requires ongoing evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of universal PCV10 vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) incidence.
  • To analyze changes in serodistribution and antimicrobial resistance of S. pneumoniae strains post-PCV10 introduction in Croatian children.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 601 invasive S. pneumoniae isolates from children (0-18 years) in Croatia (2005-2023).
  • Serotyping by capsular swelling method and antimicrobial susceptibility testing per EUCAST guidelines.
  • Comparison of IPD epidemiology in pre-PCV10 and post-PCV10 vaccination periods.

Main Results:

  • A significant reduction in IPD incidence due to PCV10 serotypes was observed, particularly in children under 5 (81.0% reduction).
  • Bacteremic pneumonia and serotype 3 became more prevalent in the post-PCV10 era.
  • Slower increases in penicillin susceptibility and macrolide resistance were noted post-PCV10.

Conclusions:

  • PCV10 introduction substantially altered IPD epidemiology in Croatian children, decreasing PCV10 serotype prevalence.
  • The evolving serodistribution indicates a need for next-generation pneumococcal vaccines.
  • PCV15 and PCV20 are potential candidates for future immunization strategies based on current serotype prevalence.
Abstract