Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Understanding implementation determinants of universal school meals through an equity-driven mixed methods approach
Gabriella M McLoughlin1, Molly Kerstetter2, Yerusalem Yohannes2
1Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA. gabriella.mcloughlin@temple.edu.
Universal School Meals (USM) implementation faces challenges, but strong leadership and addressing market pressures can improve participation. Equity-focused strategies are crucial for reducing stigma and increasing capacity for successful USM programs.
Area of Science:
- Implementation Science
- Health Equity
- Public Health Nutrition
Background:
- Universal School Meals (USM) are vital for preventing chronic disease inequities in marginalized populations.
- Low student participation in USM limits its public health impact despite reducing food insecurity and obesity risk.
- This study investigates USM implementation determinants and challenges in a large urban school district.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify determinants influencing Universal School Meals (USM) implementation in a major urban school district.
- To assess challenges and supports across schools with varying USM participation rates.
- To inform strategies for enhancing USM reach and impact through an Implementation Mapping process.
Main Methods:
- A convergent mixed-methods study was conducted in 8 schools (6 middle, 2 high) within the School District of Philadelphia.
- Data collection involved qualitative interviews, surveys, and mealtime observations, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Health Equity Measurement Framework.
- Interviews were coded to identify barriers (-1, -2) and supports (+1, +2) for USM implementation, with schools grouped by participation levels (low, moderate, high).
Main Results:
- Mid-level and High-level Leaders were the strongest facilitators of USM implementation (M=1.29 and M=0.96, respectively).
- Market Pressure (competitive foods) and Relative Priority were significant barriers (M=-1.35 and M=-1.17, respectively).
- Higher participation schools reported less stigma, more equitable procedures, and greater food service manager involvement compared to lower participation schools.
Conclusions:
- Effective Universal School Meals (USM) implementation requires strong leadership at multiple levels.
- Addressing external factors like market competition and internal factors like relative priority is crucial.
- Equity-focused strategies are essential to reduce stigma and build capacity for increased USM participation and public health impact.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Factorial Design

