Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
Published on: April 4, 2025
Open Source, Open Science: Development of OpenLESS as the Automated Landing Error Scoring System
Jeffrey A Turner1,2, Elaine T Reiche1,2, Matthew T Hartshorne1,2,3
11Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Context:
The Open Landing Error Scoring System (OpenLESS) is a novel tool for automating the LESS to assess lower extremity movement quality during a jump-landing task. With the growing use of clinical measures to monitor outcomes and limited time during clinical visits, there is a need for automated systems. OpenLESS is an open-source tool that uses a markerless motion capture system to automate the LESS using 3D kinematics.
Objective:
To describe the development of OpenLESS, examine its validity against expert rater LESS scores in healthy and clinical cohorts, and assess its intersession reliability in an athlete cohort.
Design:
Cross-Sectional.
Participants:
92 total adult participants from three distinct cohorts: a healthy university student cohort (12 males, 14 females; age=23.0±3.8 years; height=171.9±8.3 cm; mass=75.4±18.9 kg), a post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) cohort (8 males, 19 females; age=21.4±5.7 years, height=173.5±12.5 cm; mass=73.9±13.1 kg; median 33 months post surgery), and a field-based athlete cohort (39 females; age=25.0±4.7 years, height=165.0±7.1cm; mass=63.5±8.6kg).
Main Outcome Measures(S):
The OpenLESS software interprets movement quality from kinematics captured by markerless motion capture. Validity and reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measure (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC).
Results:
OpenLESS agreed well with expert rater LESS scores for healthy (ICC2,k=0.79) and clinically relevant, post-ACLR cohorts (ICC2,k=0.88). The automated OpenLESS system reduced scoring time, processing all 353 trials in under 25 minutes compared to the 35 hours (~6 minutes per trial) required for expert rater scoring. When tested outside laboratory conditions, OpenLESS showed excellent reliability across repeated sessions (ICC2,k>0.89), with a SEM of 0.98 errors and MDC of 2.72 errors.
Conclusions:
OpenLESS is a promising, efficient tool for automated jump-landing assessment, demonstrating good validity in healthy and post-ACLR populations, and excellent field reliability, addressing the need for objective movement analysis.
More Related Videos
09:38The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
Published on: June 12, 2009
04:54Author Spotlight: IntelliSleepScorer — A High-Accuracy, Accessible GUI Software for Automated Sleep Stage Scoring in Mice and its Application in Psychiatric Research
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Improving Translational Accuracy
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Margin of Error
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Distribution Reliability and Automation