What to Say When It Matters: Communication Skills to Address Implicit Bias Workshop

Bria McKenzie1, Dhanya Mahesh1, Elena Gupta2

  • 1Third-Year Medical Student, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.

Abstract

Insights

Workshops teaching communication skills effectively reduce barriers to responding to microaggressions in academic medicine. Participants reported increased knowledge and comfort after the training, highlighting the value of active learning for addressing implicit bias.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Microaggressions are prevalent in academic medicine, negatively impacting learners, faculty, and staff well-being.
  • These experiences are linked to increased depression, anxiety, and social isolation.
  • Effective communication skills training can mitigate the harmful effects of microaggressions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of active learning workshops in improving responses to microaggressions.
  • To assess changes in knowledge and comfort levels among participants.
  • To explore the role of participants (students, faculty, staff) and prior knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted 14 in-person workshops combining didactic sessions and skills practice.
  • Utilized cofacilitators trained in responding to microaggressions.
  • Surveyed student and faculty/staff participants before and after workshops, analyzing data with factorial ANOVA.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated significant increases in knowledge and comfort in identifying and responding to microaggressions (p < .001).
  • Significant interactions were found between time and participant role, and time and prior knowledge, for both knowledge and comfort.
  • The active learning approach proved effective in enhancing participants' skills.

Conclusions:

  • Active learning workshops are an effective strategy for teaching communication skills to combat implicit bias in academic medicine.
  • Involving students as co-creators enhances relevance and authenticity for the student experience.
  • Future research should explore cofacilitator experiences and compare outcomes between student and faculty/staff groups.

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
89.6K
Attitudes01:54

Attitudes

Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
27.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.4K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.2K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
70
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K