Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

70
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
70
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

3.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
3.9K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.2K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

97
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
97

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

White matter microstructural alterations correlate with clinical characteristics in craniocervical dystonia.

Neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Shared neural geometries for bilingual semantic representations in human hippocampal neurons.

Cell·2026
Same author

Gamma suppression correlates with thalamic stimulation therapeutic response in intractable epilepsy.

Epilepsia·2026
Same author

Polysemanticity in human hippocampal neurons.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

16p11.2 duplication and NMDA receptor antagonism have distinct impacts on reward learning and decision making.

Psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Traveling-wave transcranial alternating current stimulation (twtACS) causally links neural timing to cognitive function.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Genetic Impacts on Variability of Body Fat Distribution Uncover Gene-Environment and Gene-Gene Interactions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

16S ribosomal RNA modification drives transcript-specific translation efficiency.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

FlcE latches onto the FliL-stator complex to turbocharge flagellar motility in <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Synaptic pruning, myelination and the emergence of psychiatric disorders in late adolescence.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Structural and functional insights into the Rcs phosphorelay.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

The structural basis of RanGAP1 regulation and catalysis in nuclear transport.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

577

Individual differences in sequential decision-making.

Mojtaba Abbaszadeh1, Erica Ozanick1, Noa Magen1

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3T 1J4.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|April 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences in decision-making under uncertainty are primarily driven by the tendency to explore versus exploit. This exploration-exploitation balance, not personality or learning parameters, shapes behavior in complex tasks.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.6K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

577
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.6K
Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Individual variability in decision-making under uncertainty is significant.
  • Key dimensions of this variability remain unidentified.
  • Previous studies focused on specific cognitive processes or parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify the primary dimension of individual variability in uncertain decision-making.
  • Investigate factors correlating with this dimension.
  • Provide a framework for understanding individual differences in decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Analyzed behavioral data from 1001 participants on a restless three-armed bandit task.
  • Employed a novel analytical approach to control for task stochasticity.
  • Utilized latent state modeling to infer exploration probability.

Main Results:

  • Identified a dominant nonlinear axis of individual variability.
  • This axis strongly correlated with the probability of exploration.
  • Younger participants and men were overrepresented at the extremes of this axis.

Conclusions:

  • The tendency to explore versus exploit is the main factor in individual differences in bandit task performance.
  • This contrasts with personality, reinforcement learning parameters, or low-level strategies.
  • Cognitive and demographic factors shape decision-making under uncertainty.