A review of APC somatic mosaicism and specific APC variants - I1307K and promotor variants
Shira Shur1, Anna K Sommer2, Andrew Latchford3,4
1The Gonczarowski Family Institute of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shamir Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.
Abstract:
In the majority of patients with a classical Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) a pathogenic APC germline variant is identified; usually these are truncating variants in the coding region of APC. However, there are some special circumstances in which FAP is not the result of a pathogenic heterozygous germline variant in APC (mosaicism) and tspecific APC variants which do not cause FAP (I1307K and promotor variants). This paper will discuss these three conditions. APC somatic (postzygotic) mosaicism can be identified in up to 50% of unexplained adenomatous polyposis cases. The ability to identify APC postzygotic mosaicism depends on the the detection method (today usually next-generation sequencing) and also the tissue being analysed (investigation of multiple colorectal adenomas is more sensitive than leukocyte DNA). Identifying mosaicism has important implications in terms of an individual's management and managing risk in family members. The I1307K variant in APC is prevalent among Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) but can also be found in Sephardi Jews and individuals of non-Jewish descent. While this variant does not cause polyposis, it increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by 1.68-fold in AJ individuals. However, the link between the I1307K variant and CRC risk in non-AJ populations, is less well-established. Furthermore, its potential impact on other types of cancer remains unclear. Consequently, the classification of this variant, along with appropriate screening and surveillance recommendations, remains a subject of ongoing debate among leading medical and genetic organizations. Variants in the APC promotor 1B region cause the relatively newly described condition of gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS). It is said to have an isolated gastric phenotype, with neither duodenal, large bowel nor extra-intestinal manifestations. There are many uncertainties regarding this condition, it's penetrance and management. Lack of clinical data and poor understanding of the natural history of the condition remain significant barriers to developing guidelines to manage this condition.
More Related Videos
05:21Real-time Imaging of Myeloid Cells Dynamics in ApcMin/+ Intestinal Tumors by Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy
Published on: October 6, 2014
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
