Understanding preservation time thresholds in the modern era of heart transplantation

Chen Chia Wang1, Jessica B Briscoe2, Corbin E Goerlich2

  • 1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, MD, USA.

Scientific Reports
|April 16, 2025
PubMed

Insights

The traditional 4-hour heart preservation limit is less critical in modern heart transplants. Extended preservation times (5-8 hours) did not increase mortality in the modern era, suggesting the threshold may be too restrictive.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • The standard for cardiac allograft preservation is 4 hours.
  • Prolonged storage is associated with increased morbidity.
  • Novel technologies aim to improve allograft viability during preservation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of cardiac allograft preservation time on one-year mortality.
  • To compare outcomes between early (2000-2015) and modern (2020-2023) heart transplant eras.
  • To assess the influence of machine perfusion on transplant outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of adult heart transplant recipients in the United States.
  • Stratification into early and modern eras, and standard (≤4h) vs. prolonged (≥5h) preservation groups.
  • Statistical analysis including hazard ratios, confidence intervals, and spline analysis.

Main Results:

  • In the early era, prolonged preservation significantly increased one-year mortality (HR 1.60).
  • This association was not significant in the modern era (HR 1.14).
  • Preservation times of 5-8 hours did not increase one-year mortality in the modern era (HR 1.09).
  • Machine perfusion was not associated with one-year mortality (HR 1.15).

Conclusions:

  • The link between cardiac allograft preservation duration and patient mortality has weakened in the modern era.
  • The current 4-hour preservation threshold may be overly restrictive for contemporary heart transplantation.
  • Advancements in preservation techniques and recipient care have potentially mitigated risks of longer ischemic times.