Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
The relation between delayed reperfusion treatment and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with
Bård Uleberg1,2, Kaare Harald Bønaa3,4,5, Kari Krizak Halle5
1Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 6050 Stakkevollan, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Insights
Delayed reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) significantly increases the risk of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This nationwide study highlights the critical importance of timely treatment for better heart function outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition requiring prompt treatment.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a key indicator of heart function post-myocardial infarction.
- The impact of reperfusion timing on LVEF requires further investigation in large patient cohorts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between delayed reperfusion and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in STEMI patients.
- To quantify the risk of mildly to moderately reduced and severely reduced LVEF in relation to reperfusion delays.
- To compare the effects of different reperfusion strategies on LVEF outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide population-based cohort study including 6567 STEMI patients from 2015-2018.
- Log-binominal and modified Poisson regression models were used to analyze associations.
- Adjustments were made for reperfusion strategy and patient characteristics.
Main Results:
- Delayed reperfusion (fibrinolysis > 30 min or primary PCI > 120 min) was associated with increased LVEF reduction.
- The adjusted relative risk of mildly to moderately reduced LVEF was 1.11 (95% CI 1.04-1.18).
- The adjusted relative risk of severely reduced LVEF was 1.76 (95% CI 1.37-2.25).
Conclusions:
- Delayed reperfusion significantly increases the risk of both mildly to moderately reduced and severely reduced LVEF in STEMI patients.
- The choice between primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) and pharmacoinvasive strategy (PI) did not significantly alter the risk of reduced LVEF.
Aims:
The aim of this nationwide study of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was to investigate the relation between delayed reperfusion and mildly to moderately reduced and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Methods And Results:
In this national population-based cohort study, log-binominal and modified Poisson regression models were applied to examine the associations between delayed reperfusion (i.e. fibrinolysis > 30 min or primary percutaneous coronary intervention > 120 min after first medical contact) and reduced LVEF, adjusted for reperfusion strategy, and patient characteristics. A total of 6567 Norwegian patients with STEMI registered in the Norwegian Registry of Myocardial Infarction during 2015-2018 were included in the analyses. Among them, 57% had normal LVEF (≥50%), 39% had mildly to moderately reduced LVEF (31-49%), and 4% had severely reduced LVEF (≤30%), measured during the acute admission. The adjusted relative risk of having a mildly to moderately reduced LVEF was 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18] for patients receiving delayed vs. timely reperfusion, and the adjusted relative risk of having severely reduced LVEF was 1.76 (95% CI 1.37-2.25) for patients receiving delayed vs. timely reperfusion. Reperfusion strategy, either primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or a pharmacoinvasive strategy (PI), was not a significant determinant for reduced LVEF in any of the analyses.
Conclusion:
Delayed reperfusion treatment in STEMI increases the risk of mildly to moderately reduced LVEF, and the risk of severely reduced LVEF substantially, compared with timely reperfusion. The risk of reduced LVEF did not differ between patients treated with pPCI or PI.
More Related Videos
07:50Delayed Intramyocardial Delivery of Stem Cells after Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in a Murine Model
Published on: September 3, 2020
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies