Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

10:25
Microfluidic Flow Chambers Using Reconstituted Blood to Model Hemostasis and Platelet Transfusion In Vitro
Published on: March 19, 2016
Comparison of plateletapheresis with two continuous-flow cell separators using identical donors
Transfusion
|July 1, 1985
Summary
The IBM 2997 apheresis system offers superior platelet collection efficiency and lower leukocyte contamination compared to the Fenwal CS-3000. While it requires more anticoagulant and causes greater calcium reduction, it yields larger product volumes more quickly.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Medical Devices
- Transfusion Medicine
Background:
- Platelet apheresis is crucial for transfusion support.
- Comparing blood cell separators is essential for optimizing collection efficiency and product quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of the IBM 2997 and Fenwal CS-3000 blood cell separators in plateletapheresis.
Main Methods:
- 20 donors underwent plateletapheresis using both the CS-3000 and 2997 systems.
- Operator consistency was maintained for procedures and product studies.
- Key metrics including collection efficiency, yield, leukocyte contamination, anticoagulant use, calcium levels, product volume, and processing times were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The 2997 demonstrated significantly higher platelet collection efficiency (81% vs. 60%) and lower leukocyte contamination (0.09 x 10^9 vs. 0.46 x 10^9).
- While both systems provided comparable platelet yields, the 2997 resulted in larger product volumes (414 ml vs. 237 ml) and shorter processing times (90 min vs. 110 min).
- The 2997 required more anticoagulant (471 ml vs. 324 ml), led to greater ionized calcium reduction (27.3% vs. 17.0%), and was associated with more hypocalcemic symptoms.
Conclusions:
- The IBM 2997 is more efficient in platelet collection and yields a purer product with less leukocyte contamination.
- Despite increased anticoagulant use and calcium reduction, the 2997 offers advantages in processing time and product volume.
- The choice between devices may depend on balancing efficiency and potential donor side effects.

