Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2025

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS of Wernicke's and Broca's Areas in Studies of Language Learning and Word Acquisition
Published on: July 13, 2019
Graph contrastive learning with node-level accurate difference
Pengfei Jiao1,2, Kaiyan Yu1, Qing Bao1
1School of Cyberspace, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Abstract:
Graph contrastive learning (GCL) has attracted extensive research interest due to its powerful ability to capture latent structural and semantic information of graphs in a self-supervised manner. Existing GCL methods commonly adopt predefined graph augmentations to generate two contrastive views. Subsequently, they design a contrastive pretext task between these views with the goal of maximizing their agreement. These methods assume the augmented graph can fully preserve the semantics of the original. However, typical data augmentation strategies in GCL, such as random edge dropping, may alter the properties of the original graph. As a result, previous GCL methods overlooked graph differences, potentially leading to difficulty distinguishing between graphs that are structurally similar but semantically different. Therefore, we argue that it is necessary to design a method that can quantify the dissimilarity between the original and augmented graphs to more accurately capture the relationships between samples. In this work, we propose a novel graph contrastive learning framework, named Accurate Difference-based Node-Level Graph Contrastive Learning (DNGCL), which helps the model distinguish similar graphs with slight differences by learning node-level differences between graphs. Specifically, we train the model to distinguish between original and augmented nodes via a node discriminator and employ cosine dissimilarity to accurately measure the difference between each node. Furthermore, we employ multiple types of data augmentation commonly used in current GCL methods on the original graph, aiming to learn the differences between nodes under different augmentation strategies and help the model learn richer local information. We conduct extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets and the results show that our DNGCL outperforms most state-of-the-art baselines, which strongly validates the effectiveness of our model.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

