Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Teeth01:15

Teeth

247
The formation of teeth, also known as odontogenesis, is a complex process that begins in utero, around the sixth week of embryonic development. There are three stages to this process: the bud stage, the cap stage, and the bell stage.
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
247
Tooth Anatomy01:21

Tooth Anatomy

269
The human tooth enables us to eat a variety of foods, speak clearly, and even aid in shaping our faces. Teeth are composed of various elements that work together. Here's a detailed look at the anatomy of a human tooth.
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
269

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: Pharyngeal Airway and Lymphoid Tissues in Risk Assessment.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Simulator practice of temporary anchorage device (TAD) insertion on inter-radicular sites improves learning and confidence in dental residency.

Journal of dental education·2024
Same author

Decision-making patterns among expert and novice orthodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons in the management of adults with Class III malocclusions and moderate degree of skeletal discrepancies.

Journal of orthodontics·2023
Same author

Comparing the effectiveness of two diagnostic approaches for the interpretation of oral radiographic lesions by dental students.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2022
Same author

Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) generated tooth replicas with application in autotransplantation.

Journal of dentistry·2021
Same author

Studies of the criteria for determining optimal location of medial patellofemoral ligament attachment sites.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2025

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

9.4K

The geometric relationship between root length and root surface area determined from digital tooth models.

Chloe Xiao Wei Chan1, Wee Kheng Leow2, Alan Ho-Lun Cheng2

  • 1Discipline of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Computers in Biology and Medicine
|April 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Root surface area (RSA) and cross-sectional area (CSA) are key to understanding root length loss impact. Up to 20% root length reduction retains over 90% of total RSA, especially in molars.

Keywords:
3D tooth modelsExternal apical root resorptionPython algorithmRoot cross-sectional areaRoot lengthRoot surface area

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

961
Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data
09:37

Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data

Published on: April 26, 2016

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2025

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
10:50

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

Published on: April 8, 2020

9.4K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

961
Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data
09:37

Extracting Metrics for Three-dimensional Root Systems: Volume and Surface Analysis from In-soil X-ray Computed Tomography Data

Published on: April 26, 2016

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Dental Anatomy
  • Biomechanical Engineering
  • Periodontology

Background:

  • External apical root resorption (EARR) can compromise tooth stability.
  • Assessing the clinical impact of root length (RL) reduction requires understanding its effect on root surface area (RSA).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between root length (RL) and root surface area (RSA) in permanent maxillary and mandibular teeth.
  • To quantify the impact of simulated root length reduction on total root surface area (tRSA).

Main Methods:

  • Generated 3D models of human teeth from a Japanese adult male population.
  • Utilized a Python algorithm to simulate root shortening in 1 mm increments.
  • Calculated total root surface area (tRSA) by summing circumferential (cRSA) and cross-sectional (CSA) areas.

Main Results:

  • Maxillary and mandibular first molars had the largest tRSAs.
  • Initial 3 mm of root shortening caused <7% tRSA reduction in most teeth.
  • Beyond 3 mm, tRSA reduction averaged 19.4% (maxillary) and 27.77% (mandibular).
  • CSA proportion increased with greater RL reduction, significantly contributing to tRSA.

Conclusions:

  • RSA and CSA are critical for assessing clinical impact of RL loss, not just RL alone.
  • Up to 20% (approx. 3 mm) RL loss retains over 90% of tRSA.
  • Teeth with higher CSA, like molars, better maintain periodontal support despite significant RL loss.