Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Patient Directed Recording of a Bipolar Three-Lead Electrocardiogram using a Smartwatch with ECG Function
Published on: December 11, 2019
Real-time smartphone alerts during atrial fibrillation episodes with implantable cardiac monitors and wearable
Andre Briosa E Gala1, Alexander James Sharp2, Michael Timothy Brian Pope3
1Department of Cardiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom; Wessex Cardiac Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of stroke, with dynamic thromboembolic risk during and shortly after episodes. Implantable cardiac monitors and wearable devices have emerged as tools for real-time AF detection, yet their comparative performance in supporting anticoagulation strategies remains underexplored.
Objective:
This single-center feasibility study investigated the performance of real-time AF detection and notification for episodes lasting longer than 30 minutes.
Methods:
Phase 1 evaluated the integration of an implantable cardiac monitor and bespoke cloud-based software (SMART-ALERT) in sending automated short message service notifications (n = 50) for episodes uploaded within 24 hours. Phase 2 evaluated the Apple Watch (n = 23) and the CART Ring (n = 23) detecting and notifying participants of AF episodes. The primary outcome was the successful AF notification rates via (1) SMART-ALERT software and (2) wearable devices. Secondary outcomes included acknowledgment rates, notification times, and adherence.
Result:
Among 4943 AF episodes detected in 31 participants, the SMART-ALERT software successfully notified 511 of 691 eligible AF episodes (74%), with a 99.6% acknowledgment. In contrast, wearable devices showed poor notification performance: the Apple Watch identified 76 of 389 episodes (19.5%); and the CART Ring, 72 of 474 (15.1%). This performance difference was partly explained by suboptimal device adherence (Apple Watch: 66.3%; CART Ring: 23.9%), with 24.6% and 55.7% of AF episodes missed because of devices not being worn.
Conclusion:
The SMART-ALERT system demonstrated the feasibility of real-time AF detection and automated notifications, achieving a 74% notification success but facing important connectivity challenges. Wearable devices showed poor notification rates (<20%) and adherence, highlighting significant technical barriers to their current use in clinical AF monitoring.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow...

