Benchmarking mouse contamination removing protocols in patient-derived xenografts genomic profiling
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Depletion of Mouse Cells from Human Tumor Xenografts Significantly Improves Downstream Analysis of Target Cells
Published on: July 29, 2016
Mukund Bhandari1, Funan He1,2, Anna Rogojina1
1Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are widely used in cancer research. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling of PDXs are inevitably contaminated by sequencing reads originated from mouse cells. Here, we examine the impact of mouse read contamination on RNA sequencing (RNAseq), Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data of 21 PDXs. We also systematically benchmark the performance of 12 computational protocols for removing mouse reads from PDXs. We find that mouse read contamination increases expression of immune and stromal related genes, and inflates the number of somatic mutations. However, detection of gene fusions and copy number alterations is minimally affected by mouse read contamination. Using gold standard datasets, we find that pseudo-alignment protocols often demonstrate better prediction performance and computing efficiency. The best performing tool is a relatively new tool Xengsort. Our results emphasize the importance of removing mouse reads from PDXs and the need to adopt new tools in PDX genomic studies.
Insights
Mouse contamination in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models skews genomic data, inflating mutations and gene expression. New computational tools like Xengsort effectively remove mouse reads, improving PDX model accuracy for cancer research.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Cancer Research
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are crucial for cancer research.
- Genomic and transcriptomic profiling of PDX models are often contaminated by mouse sequencing reads.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of mouse read contamination on RNA sequencing (RNAseq), Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data from PDX models.
- To benchmark computational protocols for removing mouse reads from PDX data.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of RNAseq, WES, and WGS data from 21 PDX models.
- Systematic benchmarking of 12 computational protocols for mouse read removal.
- Evaluation using gold standard datasets.
Main Results:
- Mouse read contamination increases expression of immune and stromal genes and inflates somatic mutation counts.
- Detection of gene fusions and copy number alterations is minimally affected.
- Pseudo-alignment protocols showed superior performance and efficiency.
- Xengsort was identified as the best-performing tool.
Conclusions:
- Removing mouse reads is essential for accurate genomic and transcriptomic analysis of PDX models.
- Adopting advanced tools like Xengsort is recommended for PDX genomic studies.
More Related Videos
09:53Labeling of Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenografts with Traceable Reporters for Tumor Growth and Metastasis Studies
Published on: November 30, 2016
06:06Induction and Scoring of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in a Xenogeneic Murine Model and Quantification of Human T Cells in Mouse Tissues using Digital PCR
Published on: May 23, 2019
Related Concept Videos
In-vitro Mutagenesis
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...