Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Pathophysiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Published on: May 10, 2024
The Association Between Helicobacter pylori Infection and Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Systematic Review and
Lucía Gutiérrez-Ramírez1,2, Sandra L Garcia-Dionisio1,3, Sara Feo-Ortega4
1Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), Toledo, Spain.
Background:
Exposure to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been associated with reduced odds of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).
Aims:
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in order to quantify the association between H. pylori infection and EoE, and to assess the certainty of the evidence linking both conditions.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases (up to September 2024) to identify observational epidemiological studies that assessed the association between objectively measured H. pylori infection and EoE. The risk of study bias was assessed structurally using the ROBINS-E tool. Data were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Results:
Sixteen studies comprising 30,650 patients and 291,908 controls were included. Exposure to H. pylori was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of EoE (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70; I2 50%) [low-certainty evidence]. The protective effect of H. pylori was stronger in case-control studies (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35-0.69) than in cohort studies (OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.98) and was statistically significant in retrospective studies (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.72) and studies with high or very high risk of bias (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.64), but not in prospective studies (OR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.27-1.18) or those with moderate to low risk of bias (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.21).
Conclusions:
The association between H. pylori and EoE is mainly supported by retrospective studies with a high risk of bias. Further well-designed studies are needed.
Trial Registration:
PROSPERO number: CRD42024586653.
More Related Videos
03:47Retinal and Choroidal Thickness Changes in Populations with Helicobacter pylori Infection by Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: November 1, 2024
05:23Gastric Mucosa Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis for Detecting Helicobacter pylori and Antibiotic Resistance
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Treating Helicobacter pylori in Peptic Ulcers: Antimicrobial Therapy
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Injurious Factors
In the antrum region, G cells secrete the gastrin hormone that binds to gastrin-cholecystokinin-B (CCK2) receptors on parietal and enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in the fundic glands. Simultaneously, the vagus nerve releases acetylcholine, which binds...
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology