Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens02:46

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing  genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associations of perceived family economy, registry-based parental education and income with adolescent psychological distress: the Young-HUNT cross-sectional studies 2006-2008 and 2017-2019.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Lessons learned from a randomised controlled trial of a digital intervention targeting eating disorder symptoms in cisgender sexual minoritized men.

Journal of eating disorders·2026
Same author

The association between parent-child and peer relationship quality in adolescence and intimate partner relationship quality in young adulthood: A two-cohort longitudinal investigation.

Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence·2026
Same author

A Scoping Review of Australian Aboriginal Early Relational Health Knowledge Systems.

Clinical child and family psychology review·2026
Same author

Opportunities to Improve the Implementation of Relational Health Interventions for Children and Families: A Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.

Clinical child and family psychology review·2026
Same author

Personalized Treatment Selection for Digital Eating Disorder Interventions: A Proof-of-Concept for the Personalized Advantage Index.

The International journal of eating disorders·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.2K

Artificial Intelligence Software to Accelerate Screening for Living Systematic Reviews.

Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz1,2, Allan Jones3, Rajesh Vasa3

  • 1School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. matthewf@deakin.edu.au.

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
|April 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary

LitQuest, a new AI software, speeds up literature screening for systematic reviews. It helps create living systematic reviews, saving time and costs in rapidly evolving scientific fields.

Keywords:
AccuracyArtificial intelligenceEfficiencyMachine learningSystematic reviews

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K
Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells
00:09

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells

Published on: September 4, 2019

21.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.2K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.4K
Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells
00:09

Pooled CRISPR-Based Genetic Screens in Mammalian Cells

Published on: September 4, 2019

21.5K

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Information Science
  • Artificial Intelligence in Research

Background:

  • Systematic and meta-analytic reviews are crucial for evidence-based practice.
  • Traditional reviews are static and become outdated rapidly.
  • Living systematic reviews offer a solution for dynamic evidence synthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of LitQuest, an AI-powered software platform.
  • To assess LitQuest's efficiency and accuracy in accelerating literature screening.
  • To determine LitQuest's utility in supporting living systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • LitQuest performance was tested using data from seven systematic reviews.
  • Efficiency was measured by the proportion of literature requiring human screening.
  • Algorithm performance was assessed using work saved over sampling (WSS) for recall.
  • Accuracy was determined by the proportion of incorrectly classified papers.

Main Results:

  • On average, 36% of literature required human screening, ranging from 22% to 53%.
  • LitQuest demonstrated 99% accuracy with 95% interrater reliability.
  • 0% of titles/abstracts were incorrectly assigned by the algorithm.

Conclusions:

  • LitQuest offers a cost-effective and time-efficient solution for systematic reviews.
  • The software is particularly beneficial for living systematic reviews in fast-paced scientific areas.
  • Future developments include full-text extraction and community access to findings.