Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.1K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

2.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
2.6K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

2.0K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.0K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.6K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.6K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.2K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
1.2K
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I01:21

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I

1.6K
An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care.
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geographical diversity of peer reviewers shapes author success.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Does the use of unusual combinations of datasets contribute to greater scientific impact?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation.

Management science·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

18.9K

Evaluating interdisciplinary research: Disparate outcomes for topic and knowledge base.

Sidney Xiang1, Daniel M Romero1,2,3, Misha Teplitskiy1

  • 1University of Michigan School of Information, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Interdisciplinary research acceptance varies by type. Knowledge-base interdisciplinarity boosts acceptance, while topic interdisciplinarity may decrease it, especially in traditional journals.

Keywords:
interdisciplinaritypeer reviewpublishing

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

574

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

18.9K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.4K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

574

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Research evaluation
  • STEM disciplines

Background:

  • Interdisciplinary research is crucial for global challenges.
  • Concerns exist regarding scientific journals' selection against interdisciplinary work.
  • Previous studies focused on published paper outcomes, not acceptance probabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how different dimensions of interdisciplinarity affect manuscript acceptance rates.
  • To determine if topic and knowledge-base interdisciplinarity are evaluated differently by journals.
  • To examine the moderating effects of dimension alignment and journal type on acceptance.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 128,950 manuscript submissions across 62 STEM journals.
  • Distinction between topic interdisciplinarity (title/abstract) and knowledge-base interdisciplinarity (references).
  • Statistical modeling to assess the impact of interdisciplinarity dimensions on acceptance probability.

Main Results:

  • Knowledge-base interdisciplinarity positively correlates with acceptance probability (0.9 pp per 1SD increase).
  • Topic interdisciplinarity negatively correlates with acceptance probability (1.2 pp per 1SD decrease).
  • Topic interdisciplinarity penalties are reduced when knowledge-base interdisciplinarity is high or journals are designated as "interdisciplinary".

Conclusions:

  • Journal evaluation of interdisciplinary research is nuanced, not uniformly biased.
  • Distinguishing between topic and knowledge-base interdisciplinarity is critical for understanding acceptance.
  • Manuscript alignment with journal scope and audience influences evaluation outcomes.