Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2025

10:15
Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
17.6K
Translating Technology Into Speech-Language Pathology Practice: Qualitative Interviews Using Transcranial Magnetic
Ellen E R Williams1,2, Brenton Hordacre3, Nigel C Rogasch1,2,4
1School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
|April 18, 2025
Summary
Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) attitudes towards transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are influenced by knowledge, professional role, mindset, and environment. Addressing these factors and profession-wide gaps is key for integrating new technologies like TMS into practice.
Area of Science:
- Speech-language pathology
- Neuroscience
- Clinical implementation science
Background:
- Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) utilize various technologies, with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) emerging for communication and swallowing disorders.
- SLPs are likely to deliver TMS, necessitating early consideration of their attitudes and potential barriers to adoption.
- Existing research on SLP attitudes toward TMS is limited, particularly concerning profession-wide research-to-practice gaps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore determinants of SLP behavior influencing TMS adoption in speech-language pathology practice.
- To examine these behavioral determinants within the context of broader research-to-practice gaps in the profession.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 SLPs across novice, intermediate, and expert TMS knowledge levels.
- Reflexive thematic analysis was employed for data coding, guided by the refined Theoretical Domains Framework (rTDF).
- The rTDF informed study design, analysis, interpretation, and the development of recommendations.
Main Results:
- Four key determinants of SLP behavior emerged: knowledge/experience, professional role perceptions, mindset/emotions, and environmental factors.
- Results were categorized into TMS-specific determinants and broader, profession-wide issues.
- Specific determinants included actual knowledge, perceived capabilities, optimism/pessimism, and external influences.
Conclusions:
- Numerous TMS-specific behavioral factors can impede its translation into speech-language pathology practice.
- These factors are compounded by significant profession-wide research-to-practice translation issues.
- A taxonomy of nine recommendations is proposed to bridge these gaps, facilitating the implementation of TMS and other technologies.

