Meta-analysis of the efficacy of applying reduced surgery for the treatment of asymptomatic unresectable advanced gastric cancer
- Xiong Li 1,2, Ting Lei 3, Liangyin Fu 1,2, Ruiyu Gao 2, Ning Cao 2, Yuanhui Gu 1,2, He Su 1,2, Tiankang Guo 2, Yang Che 4,5
- Xiong Li 1,2, Ting Lei 3, Liangyin Fu 1,2
- 1Department Cadre Ward of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
- 2Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
- 3The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
- 4Department Cadre Ward of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China. zbcheyang007@163.com.
- 5Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China. zbcheyang007@163.com.
- 0Department Cadre Ward of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.For asymptomatic unresectable advanced gastric cancer, reduced surgery does not improve survival rates. This approach also increases complication risks compared to non-surgical treatment.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
Background
- Advanced gastric cancer presents significant treatment challenges, particularly when unresectable.
- Asymptomatic patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer require careful consideration of palliative treatment options.
Purpose Of The Study
- To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduction surgery in asymptomatic patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer.
- To compare survival outcomes and complication rates between reduced surgery and non-surgical treatment.
Main Methods
- A meta-analysis was conducted using studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.
- Included studies were assessed for quality and bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
- Data from 1 randomized controlled trial and 4 retrospective studies (1717 patients) were analyzed.
Main Results
- Reduced surgery did not demonstrate a survival benefit (1-, 3-, or 5-year survival rates) compared to non-surgical treatment.
- The reduced surgery group experienced a longer median survival time (11.58 months) but had higher incidence and morbidity rates (5.5% and 6.5% higher).
- Perioperative complications and mortality in the reduced surgery group were 15% and 4%, respectively.
Conclusions
- Current evidence indicates that reduced surgery for asymptomatic unresectable advanced gastric cancer does not offer long-term survival advantages.
- The procedure is associated with increased risks of complications and mortality.
- Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to solidify these findings and guide clinical practice.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

