Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Non-equilibrium in the Cell01:16

Non-equilibrium in the Cell

4.1K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
4.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.8K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.8K
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

230
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
230
Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

964
Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
964
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.1K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.1K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Operative stewardship: reclaiming the role of surgical source control in dental antimicrobial stewardship.

Frontiers in oral health·2026
Same author

Dental Professionals' Attitudes Toward Treating Patients With Sensory Impairments: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry·2026
Same author

Digital Workflow Integration in Acute Panfacial Fracture Management.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same author

Validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and ICD-10 Codes for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) Among Individuals Prescribed Antiresorptives for Fracture Prevention Across Two Cohorts.

Clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Do Cannabis Users Require More Anesthesia During Third Molar Removal Under Intravenous General Anesthesia When Compared to Nonusers?

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same author

Foreign Body Ingestion or Inhalation Management for Dental Offices.

Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)·2026
Same journal

A Plastic Film Guiding Sheath (PFGS) Reduces Epistaxis in Patients Undergoing Nasotracheal Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesives in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Narrative Review of Clinical Outcomes.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Generative Artificial Intelligence for Orthognathic Planning: Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Jaw Reference Forms Conditioned on the Cranial Base.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Is Ozone Therapy Effective in Preventing and Treating Alveolar Osteitis? A Systematic Review.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment of Bilateral Condylar Fractures: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study Derived From the BCFx Registry.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Learning Curve in Trigeminal Nerve Assessment Using Medical Research Council Scale: A Repeated-Measures Study Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Residents and Faculty Experts.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

26.7K

How Artificial Intelligence Differs From Humans in Peer Review.

Michael V Joachim1, Thomas B Dodson2, Amir Laviv3

  • 1Senior Faculty, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Goldschleger School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Attending Surgeon, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Dental Division, Shamir Medical Center, Tzrifin, Be'er Ya'akov, Israel.

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery : Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
|April 19, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Artificial intelligence (AI) models showed high consistency in manuscript reviews but were less likely to recommend rejection than human reviewers. AI is best used as a screening tool to support, not replace, expert human review in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.4K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

26.7K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

2.4K
Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses
05:21

Characterization of the Sense of Agency over the Actions of Neural-machine Interface-operated Prostheses

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Scientific Publishing

Background:

  • Peer review in oral and maxillofacial surgery faces challenges like reviewer fatigue and bias.
  • Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions, but its use in this field's peer review is unexamined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the manuscript review performance of four large language models (LLMs) against human reviewers.
  • To evaluate AI's potential to address challenges in scientific peer review.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study of 22 original research articles from the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2023).
  • Four AI models (dense transformers, sparse-expert, multimodal, base transformer) and human reviewers evaluated manuscripts.
  • Outcomes included reviewer recommendations, responses to editor questions, temporal stability, and domain-specific scoring.

Main Results:

  • AI models had significantly lower rejection rates (0-9.1%) compared to human reviewers (68.2%).
  • AI demonstrated high temporal stability (ICC=0.88) and moderate agreement with human decisions (κ=0.38-0.46).

Conclusions:

  • AI models exhibit reliable internal consistency in manuscript review.
  • AI is less likely to recommend rejection than human reviewers, suggesting its role as a complementary screening tool.