Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Trajectory Data Analyses for Pedestrian Space-time Activity Study
Published on: February 25, 2013
High-order diversity feature learning for pedestrian attribute recognition
Abstract:
Pedestrian attribute recognition (PAR) involves accurately identifying multiple attributes present in pedestrian images. There are two main approaches for PAR: part-based method and attention-based method. The former relies on existing segmentation or region detection methods to localize body parts and learn corresponding attribute-specific feature from the corresponding regions, where the performance heavily depends on the accuracy of body region localization. The latter adopts the embedded attention modules or transformer attention to exploit detailed feature. However, it can focus on certain body regions but often provide coarse attention, failing to capture fine-grained details, the learned feature may also be interfered with by irrelevant information. Meanwhile, these methods overlook the global contextual information. This work argues for replacing coarse attention with detailed attention and integrating it with global contextual feature from ViT to jointly represent attribute-specific regions. To tackle this issue, we propose a High-order Diversity Feature Learning (HDFL) method for PAR based on ViT. We utilize a polynomial predictor to design an Attribute-specific Detailed Feature Exploration (ADFE) module, which can construct the high-order statistics and gain more fine-grained feature. Our ADFE module is a parameter-friendly method that provides flexibility in deciding its utilization during the inference phase. A Soft-redundancy Perception Loss (SPLoss) is proposed to adaptively measure the redundancy between feature of different orders, which can promote diverse characterization of features. Experiments on several PAR datasets show that our method achieves a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. On the most challenging PA100K dataset, our method outperforms previous SOTA by 1.69% and achieves the highest mA of 84.92%.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Aggregates Classification
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Diversity of Antigen Receptors
Before encountering any antigen, lymphocytes express these receptors. On B cells, the antigen receptor is a membrane-bound antibody molecule called BCR; on T cells, it is a T cell receptor or TCR. B and T cell receptors are composed of two...

