Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Defamation Claims Arising from Research Misconduct Cases: Best Practices for Institutions
Nathaniel Jaffe1, Minal Caron1, Lauren Walsh2
1Ropes & Gray LLP, Health Care Practice Group, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
None:
Researchers involved in research misconduct proceedings are increasingly threatening or bringing legal defamation claims against the institutions, complainants, and publications involved in the proceedings. Although defamation claims do not often succeed, they can nevertheless be costly and lengthy. This article analyzes certain defamation cases in the research misconduct space and provides advice for institutions and other involved parties seeking to minimize potential defamation liability associated with research misconduct proceedings.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Ethics and Bioethics
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Torts II
Ethical Dilemmas II

