Related Experiment Videos
Mother-blaming in major clinical journals
Paula J Caplan1, Ian Hall-McCorquodale1
1Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
|July 1, 1985
Summary
This study examined mother-blaming in clinical journals from 1970-1982. Findings indicate minimal changes, suggesting limited impact from the women's movement on reducing this bias.
Area of Science:
- Medical sociology
- Gender studies
- Psychiatry
Background:
- Mother-blaming, a form of gender bias, has been a persistent issue in medical and psychological literature.
- The women's movement aimed to challenge societal biases, including those directed at mothers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence of mother-blaming in prominent clinical journals.
- To assess if trends in mother-blaming changed between 1970, 1976, and 1982.
- To determine the influence of the women's movement on these trends.
Main Methods:
- Content analysis of articles published in major clinical journals.
- Data collection across three specific years: 1970, 1976, and 1982.
- Analysis of the incidence of mother-blaming and its correlation with journal type and author's sex.
Main Results:
- Very few significant reductions in mother-blaming were observed across the studied years.
- The type of journal and the sex of the author had only a slight effect on the incidence of mother-blaming.
- The study found limited evidence of substantial change in the portrayal of mothers during this period.
Conclusions:
- The efforts of the women's movement appeared to have a minimal impact on reducing mother-blaming in clinical journals during the investigated timeframe.
- Mother-blaming persisted as a notable issue, with slight variations based on publication type and author demographics.
- Further research is needed to explore more effective strategies for combating gender bias in medical literature.