Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research
Published on: April 22, 2022
A Comparison Between Multisonic and Ultrasonic Irrigant Activation Techniques for Multispecies Biofilm Removal During
Preethi Varadan1, Sangavi Ra1, Mathan R Rajendran1
1Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research Deemed-to-be-University, Chennai, IND.
Abstract:
This systematic review aims to compare multisonic and ultrasonic irrigant activation techniques in polymicrobial biofilm removal. We conducted a literature search involving SCOPUS, PubMed, Cochrane, EBSCO host, and LILACS databases from inception to December 2024, in addition to a manual search using Google Scholar. The risk of bias assessment was done using the guidelines described for in vitro studies and the criteria for evaluation was based on JBI criteria and CRIS guidelines for quality assessment of in vitro studies. Three articles were included in the final analysis. The included studies evaluated biofilm removal in extracted teeth models incubated with biofilm; while two studies used quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methodology, one used colony forming unit (CFU). Except in the study by Llerena et al., the GentleWave® multisonic System (GWS) outperformed ultrasonic irrigant activation (UI) in terms of biofilm removal. Despite the limitations of this systematic review, multisonic irrigant activation demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing intraradicular biofilm when compared to ultrasonic irrigant activation.

