Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Dosimetric Evaluation of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, RapidArc, and Hybrid RapidArc Radiotherapy
Atul Mishra1, Neha Yadav2, Madhu Sharma3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Objective:
This study aimed to assess the irradiation techniques-three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), RapidArc (RArc), and hybrid RapidArc (h-RArc)-for left-sided breast cancer patients, focusing on dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risks (OARs).
Materials And Methods:
This study enrolled 20 patients diagnosed with early-stage left-sided breast cancer. All patients received a prescribed dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions (2.67 Gy per fraction), optimized to achieve 95% dose coverage to 95% of the PTV. The dosimetric variations across the three treatment plans for the 20 patients were examined using a one-way ANOVA test. P <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Results:
In the 3DRCT plan, D95% of the PTV was 37.21 ± 0.51 Gy. This value was significantly increased to 39.43 ± 0.27 Gy in the RArc plan (P = 0.001) and to 38.47 ± 0.19 Gy in the h-RArc plan (P = 0.630). The RArc plans demonstrated a superior homogeneity index of 0.12 ± 0.02 compared to both 3DCRT (0.18 ± 0.02) and h-RArc (0.13 ± 0.02). When comparing the increase in monitor units (MUs), h-RArc showed a 62.82% increase over 3D-CRT, whereas demonstrating a 38.05% decrease compared to RArc (P = 0.000).
Conclusions:
h-RArc treatment plans for breast cancer may be recommended due to their superior and consistent PTV dose coverage and sparing of OARs, in comparison to both 3DRCT and RArc plans. These h-RArc plans are characterized by reduced MU and beam on time, as well as a less low volume dose when compared to RArc plans.
