Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
Published on: September 25, 2021
Machine learning vs human experts: sacroiliitis analysis from the RAPID-axSpA and C-OPTIMISE phase 3 axSpA trials
Fabian Proft1, Janis L Vahldiek2, Joeri Nicolaes3,4
1Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Objective:
Diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is primarily established through the identification of the presence or absence of radiographic sacroiliitis. However, the reliability of conventional radiographs (X-rays) is undermined by significant interreader variability. A machine learning tool could reduce diagnosis time, thereby minimising interreader variability. The present study aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning model for detecting radiographic sacroiliitis in axSpA patients from the RAPID-axSpA (NCT01087762) and C-OPTIMISE (NCT02505542) trials.
Methods:
Radiographs from the RAPID-axSpA and C-OPTIMISE cohorts were retrospectively used. The deep learning model was previously trained by using a transfer learning approach on non-medical data. The model's agreement with expert readers was tested on baseline X-rays using central reader data. Sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's κ, positive and negative predictive values and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve were calculated.
Results:
The model's performance was evaluated in the RAPID-axSpA (n = 277) and C-OPTIMISE (n = 739) cohorts. In RAPID-axSpA, the model achieved 82% sensitivity, 81% specificity and a Cohen's κ of 0.61, closely matching central reader performance. In C-OPTIMISE, the model demonstrated 90% sensitivity, 56% specificity and a Cohen's κ of 0.48. The agreement between the model and central readers was 82% (RAPID-axSpA) and 75% (C-OPTIMISE).
Conclusions:
The tested deep learning model exhibited accurate radiographic sacroiliitis detection in axSpA patients from diverse clinical trials. The proposed deep learning model could expedite diagnosis, reduce healthcare resource usage and improve patient care pathways.
Related Concept Videos
Machines: Problem Solving II
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Classification of Systems-I
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:

