Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025

Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
Drug development in dermatology: challenges in treating young patients
Klaus Rose1, Tomoko Maeda-Chubachi2, Jane M Grant-Kels3
1Klausrose Consulting, Lörrach, Germany.
Pediatric drug development faces regulatory hurdles, particularly in the EU, where the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has rigid pediatric investigation plan (PIP) demands. This creates challenges for drug sponsors, widening the gap between US and EU development.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Pediatric Drug Development
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- Children are often 'therapeutic orphans' in drug development, necessitating specific pediatric requirements from regulatory bodies like the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
- The EMA mandates a 'pediatric investigation plan' (PIP) early in the drug development process.
- Skin maturation differs between age groups, impacting drug absorption and efficacy, yet regulatory approaches vary significantly between the US and EU.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the differing pediatric drug development requirements between the FDA and EMA.
- To highlight the challenges posed by the EMA's stringent PIP process.
- To discuss the implications of these regulatory differences on the pace of pediatric drug development.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of FDA and EMA pediatric drug development guidelines.
- Case study examples of crisaborole for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis drug development.
- Review of the impact of PIP negotiations on development timelines and strategies.
Main Results:
- The FDA accepted pivotal trials for crisaborole (atopic dermatitis) across a wide age range (2-79 years), which the EMA also accepted as part of its PIP.
- For psoriasis, the EMA's PIP specifically requires separate efficacy and safety data in children aged 6-17 years.
- EMA's rigid stance and lengthy PIP negotiations contrast with the FDA's more flexible approach, leading to frustration and delays.
Conclusions:
- Regulatory divergence between the FDA and EMA creates significant challenges for pediatric drug development, particularly for skin disorders.
- The EMA's stringent requirements, while aiming for safety, can hinder timely access to new treatments for pediatric populations.
- Pharmaceutical companies need a deep understanding of regulatory nuances, patience, and potentially external expertise to navigate these complex processes effectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Drug Discovery: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...

