Health Professionals' Attitudes Towards Traditional Healing for Mental Illness: A Systematic Review

Combining modern treatments with traditional healing approaches has been proposed as one way to address mental health problems, especially in low-income countries where the costs of pharmaceuticals often prevent or reduce their use. Despite health professionals' involvement being crucial for the integration of this approach, their involvement has been limited to date. This systematic review is designed to explore the attitudes of health professionals towards traditional healing practices for mental illness. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were followed. The studies were identified from Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Web of Sciences. The qualities of the included articles were assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018, and mixed-method synthesis was used to narrate the results. Of the 2115 identified articles, 36 were included in the data synthesis. From the extracted data, health professionals had negative, mixed, and positive views towards traditional healing approaches for mental illness. Their negative attitude towards traditional healing approaches were due to their concerns that traditional healing may cause harm to service users, and they have no trust in the scientific basis, education, or practices of healers. Despite the fact that it is crucial for healthcare professionals to comprehend the cultural backgrounds of those receiving mental health services in order to offer care appropriately, health professionals' negative and mixed attitudinal expressions towards traditional healing approaches limit their involvement. This might be improved by identifying barriers from the perspective of practitioners and creating culturally appropriate guidelines for communication and referral between traditional healing approaches and biomedical care.