Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2025
Three-dimensional Navigation-guided, Prone, Single-position, Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique
Published on: July 15, 2021
Comparison of Revision Rates Among Patients Undergoing 2-Level ACDF, CDR, and Hybrid Constructs
Wesley M Durand1, Yesha Parekh1, Sang Hun Lee1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Study Design:
Retrospective database study.
Objective:
Compare the revision rates of 2-level ACDF, CDR, and hybrid ACDF/CDR.
Summary Of Background Data:
While single-level CDR has been extensively studied, multilevel CDR and hybrid ACDF/CDR constructs have been less well studied.
Methods:
This study utilized a large commercial insurance database of patients 65 years old or younger. Patients undergoing 2-level ACDF, 2-level CDR, and hybrid 2-level ACDF/CDR were identified. Patients age 18 years or older with malignant, infectious, or neoplastic etiologies were excluded, as were those undergoing revision surgery or any concomitant posterior cervical surgery. Study follow-up was terminated at 5 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was revision surgery, including anterior and posterior decompression, fusion, and arthroplasty.
Results:
A total of 99,282 patients were included. The mean age was 51.3 years old (SD 8.1). The mean maximum follow-up was 2.1 years (SD 1.7). In all 3.2% (n=3197) underwent 2-level CDR, 0.5% (n=448) underwent hybrid 2-level ACDF/CDR, and 96.3% (n=95,637) underwent 2-level ACDF. At 5 years postoperatively, in Kaplan-Meier analysis, revision occurred in 10.0% of the CDR group, 12.4% of the hybrid group, and 10.0% of the ACDF group. In multivariable regression analysis, no significant differences in revision occurrence were observed between the CDR, hybrid, and ACDF groups ( P <0.15 for all comparisons). In multivariable regression analysis stratified by plate versus stand-alone cage, patients with plated hybrid constructs had higher revision rates than those with both plated ACDF constructs (HR: 1.5, P =0.0387) and 2-level CDR (HR: 1.5, P =0.0477).
Conclusions:
In this retrospective database study of patients 65 years old or younger undergoing 2-level anterior cervical surgery, there were no significant differences at 5-year follow-up in revision rates for patients undergoing 2-level CDR, 2-level ACDF, and hybrid ACDF/CDR surgeries. In subanalysis, patients specifically with a plated hybrid ACDF/CDR had a higher occurrence of revision versus those undergoing plated 2-level ACDF or 2-level CDR. Future multicenter, prospective research is necessary to further assess these findings.
